New tcpdump in 8.x
Edwin Groothuis
edwin at mavetju.org
Fri Sep 11 22:56:49 UTC 2009
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:12:05AM +0200, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > Who has used tcpdump on FreeBSD 8.x and likes it? Is it just me or is
> > it now far harder to investigate network problems using it?
> >
> > Prior to 8.x, the default output includes SEQ number ranges for any
> > TCP packets with data, so a 'tcpdump -n' looks like the following and
> > it's immediately obvious that there's 2920 bytes of data missing:
> ...
> > The same output on 8.x looks like the following. Whilst the last ACK
> > packet looks anomolous, there's no useful information to analyse further.
>
> I agree that this change is rather unhelpful. However, this is the
> default for tcpdump 4.0.0. Thus the choice is between the old tcpdump,
> the new one (with bugfixes and more protocol decoding), or possibly
> the new one plus local patches. Not an easy choice, is it?
While I agree with the original poster that you are missing some
data, I also agree that talking to the "vendors" of tcpdump is a
better way.
Peter, if you are keen on it, submit a port (net/tcpdump39) which
gives you the old functionality and alert me about it.
Edwin, who at least now knows why tcpdump on 8.0B3 did look so trange.
--
Edwin Groothuis Website: http://www.mavetju.org/
edwin at mavetju.org Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list