nat and ipfw - divert or builtin
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sun Sep 23 08:53:49 PDT 2007
> I believe the integrated version makes configuration simpler. I would
> choose the old classic divert with ipfw if it is for a important network
> that must work, but if I was running -current I would try the integrated
> variant beacuse it seems to be simpler to use.
and one less daemon. less code is better code.
i will likely give it a try. thanks.
randy
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list