is setsockopt SO_NOSIGPIPE work?

[Anton Yuzhaninov]

Thursday, March 1, 2007, 6:29:42 PM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

RE> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:17:29PM +0300, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
>> Is SO_NOSIGPIPE work?
>> 
>> It try to set on socket option SO_NOSIGPIPE but anyway process
>> received sigpipe.
>> 
RE> It works, but only if you use send() instead of write().
RE> Alternatively, you can control the behavior on a per
RE> message basis, by passing the MSG_NOSIGNAL in the "flags"
RE> argument to the send() call (without having to set a
RE> socket option).

Thanks, with send() it works fine.
I think it should be documented in setsockopt(2).

-- 
 WBR, Anton Yuzhaninov