Routing outbound IP packets on multihomed box
Christopher Cowart
ccowart at rescomp.berkeley.edu
Fri Jun 15 22:01:43 UTC 2007
Hello,
I have a server with two NICs:
em0: 169.229.79.139/25
vlan526: 169.229.126.9/24
The default gateway is 169.229.79.129. The router for the 126 subnet is
169.229.126.1.
netstat -rn:
| Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
| default 169.229.79.129 UGS 0 102537 em0
| 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 217 lo0
| 169.229.79.128/25 link#1 UC 0 0 em0
| 169.229.79.129 00:15:c7:b9:f4:80 UHLW 2 4 em0 1193
| 169.229.79.139 00:11:25:ab:42:70 UHLW 1 589 lo0
| 169.229.126/24 link#9 UC 0 0 vlan52
| 169.229.126.1 00:15:c7:b9:f4:80 UHLW 1 34 vlan52 1200
| 169.229.126.9 00:18:f8:09:d3:a5 UHLW 1 8 lo0
The IP address on em0 works exactly as one would expect. I have full IP
connectivity to it from other subnets.
The problem is I can't get 2-way connectivity with the IP address on
vlan526.
Using my workstation on a third subnet (169.229.127.38/24), I cannot
ping 169.229.126.9. I leave the ping running and do some tcpdumps on
the server.
$ sudo tcpdump -ni vlan526 host 169.229.127.38
| 14:14:37.002920 IP 169.229.127.38 > 169.229.126.9: ICMP echo
| request, id 15733, seq 35, length 64
| 14:14:38.003037 IP 169.229.127.38 > 169.229.126.9: ICMP echo
| request, id 15733, seq 36, length 64
Notice there are no echo replies. That's because they're being sent
here:
$ sudo tcpdump -ni em0 host 169.229.127.38
| 14:15:42.006997 IP 169.229.126.9 > 169.229.127.38: ICMP echo reply,
| id 15733, seq 100, length 64
| 14:15:43.007118 IP 169.229.126.9 > 169.229.127.38: ICMP echo reply,
| id 15733, seq 101, length 64
I repeated this last snoop with a -w and loaded it into ethereal. The
echo replies being sent out on em0 indeed have a source address of
169.229.126.9. The router (169.229.79.139) drops these packets on the
floor, because their source address isn't routable on that interface.
Because routing is based on destination, not source address, I'm not
sure how to get packets sourced from the 126 subnet to the router on the
126 subnet. I tried the following ipfw rule right after allow loopback
traffic (my second rule):
fwd 169.229.126.1 ip from 169.229.126.9 to not 169.229.126.0/24
Still no luck. Has anyone set up a multihomed box on *different* subnets
before without routing them through the FreeBSD box? Does anyone have
any pointers or things I should be looking at?
Thanks,
--
Chris Cowart
Lead Systems Administrator
Network Infrastructure, RSSP-IT
UC Berkeley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20070615/eb94870e/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list