VLANs and routing
David DeSimone
fox at verio.net
Fri Jun 15 16:45:17 UTC 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy at optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> > But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
> > machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one
> > should.
> [...]
> > Is this kind of setup even supported?
>
> I don't see how it could be if machine1 is an IP endpoint: In order
> to transmit a packet, it needs to put a source IP address into the
> packet - which virtually always comes from the interface.
When originating a packet, that is the case. But a forwarded packet
already has a source address, which can be left unchanged. As long as
routing is working (ARP is not needed, destination is clear, etc), the
intermediate interface need not have an IP.
- --
David DeSimone == Network Admin == fox at verio.net
"It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no
talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because
by that time I was too famous. -- Robert Benchley
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGcr36FSrKRjX5eCoRAnnwAJ4l/TIJPiMsNULHhAoJi6q12Y/vygCggBEe
k47dQu/ZHnKNEPTaE9aW4lQ=
=pg4w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list