6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet

David DeSimone fox at verio.net
Fri Jul 13 18:08:46 UTC 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bill Moran <wmoran at collaborativefusion.com> wrote:
>
> Let's flip the question around a bit:  why would you _want_ the TCP
> stack to accept frames larger than the stated MTU?

If I receive a 64K frame and the TCP checksum checks out, and the
sequence numbers match, and it passes my firewall state, why NOT receive
it?  It is obviously valid, even if I cannot understand how my interface
could have received it.  The packet is here, so do something useful with
it.

I agree with others that MTU means "limit what I transmit".  It does not
mean "limit what someone else can transmit to me."

- -- 
David DeSimone == Network Admin == fox at verio.net
  "It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no
   talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because
   by that time I was too famous.  -- Robert Benchley
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGl7+oFSrKRjX5eCoRAg/IAKCjpErjfEMx33emhDqtNs327Hi1vQCfQnpC
i+33Od/k39MaAF/1LZyxj4I=
=xtlB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-net mailing list