MFC of ether_input() changes

Julian Elischer julian at elischer.org
Fri Apr 20 16:03:52 UTC 2007


Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does anyone want to see these changes MFCed, or otherwise object to such 
> an MFC?
> The introduction of M_PROMISC did the following:
> 
>   * Drop frames immediately if the interface is not marked IFF_UP.

ok

>   * Always trim off the frame checksum if present.
>   * Always use M_VLANTAG in preference to passing 802.1Q frames
>     to consumers.

ok, though I may have to change production code (or at least retest it)

>   * Use __func__ consistently for KASSERT().

ok

>   * Use the M_PROMISC flag to detect situations where ether_input()
>     may reenter itself on the same call graph with the same mbuf which
>     was promiscuously received on behalf of subsystems such as
>     netgraph, carp, and vlan.

ok

>   * 802.1P frames (that is, VLAN frames with an ID of 0) will now be
>     passed to layer 3 input paths.

>   * Deal with the special case for CARP in a sane way.

I don't  use CARP

> 
> For end users the main change of interest will be the ability for 
> FreeBSD to receive 802.1p frames, even if it doesn't do anything with 
> the priority fields right now.
> 
> If I hear 'yeses' I will try to MFC this as time permits.

OK by me, but I defer to anyone who says no..
> 
> Regards,
> BMS
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"



More information about the freebsd-net mailing list