Much improved sosend_*() functions

[Randall Stewart]

Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Randall Stewart wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hmm.. I would think 512b and 1K will not show any
>>improvement.. since they would probably end up either
>>in an mbuf chain.. or a single 2k (or maybe 4k) cluster..
> 
> 
> I know, I just want to make sure that it doesn't somehow cause performance
> loss for those cases!
> 
> 
>>In fact I have always thought we should:
>>
>>a) have no data portion in an mbuf.. just pointers i.e. always
>>    an EXT
>>
>>b) Have a 256/512 and 1k cluster too..

Hmm.. I could do that.. maybe I will when my
plate clears off a bit.. but then again.. that may
be never :-0

R
> 
> 
> Implement and benchmark it. :)
> 
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack
> 


-- 
Randall Stewart
NSSTG - Cisco Systems Inc.
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222 (cell)