changing default route
OxY
oxy at field.hu
Tue May 16 14:42:21 UTC 2006
but bridging needs ipfw (or pf) and with heavy traffic
it needs lots of cpu.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marcin Jessa" <lists at yazzy.org>
To: "OxY" <oxy at field.hu>
Cc: <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: changing default route
> On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:53:38 +0200
> "OxY" <oxy at field.hu> wrote:
>
>> any other solution?
>> can i solve it with static routing?
>
> Create a bridge interface, assign both the nics as it's members and
> assign the IP to it.
>
> Marcin.
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Charles Swiger" <cswiger at mac.com>
>> To: "OxY" <oxy at field.hu>
>> Cc: <freebsd-net at freebsd.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:10 AM
>> Subject: Re: changing default route
>>
>>
>> > On May 15, 2006, at 7:04 PM, OxY wrote:
>> >> have two interfaces with the same ip, em0 connected to another
>> >> server with crosslink, em1 is the public, can be reached from the
>> >> internet connected to a switch.
>> >
>> > Don't do that. Use bridging instead, if appropriate.
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Chuck
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list