strange limitation on rcmd()

[Mikhail Teterin]

On Monday 10 July 2006 10:17, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
= Actually it is, but it would obviously be a stupid idea to do so any
= place where privileged ports are required...

It would be. But where they are NOT required, it is stupid to check the 
geteuid() inside the client's rcmd :-)

Thank you very much for your explanation, Brian, rsh being an SUID is 
something I overlooked.

What I remain upset about, though, is that the rcmdsh(), which is used by 
rcmd() ignores the fd2p parameter making it impossible to capture the 
remote's stderr...

Yours,

	-mi