possible patch for implementing split DNS

[Julian Elischer]

Phil Regnauld wrote:

>eculp at bafirst.com (eculp) writes:
>  
>
>>I assume that you have seen the following:
>>
>>http://www.howtoforge.com/two_in_one_dns_bind9_views
>>    
>>
>
>	That is definitely the right way to do it imho.
>  
>

unless as I said, I cannot run another nameserver on this box.. (there 
is already one running here)
and even if I could I couldn't distiguish which sessions should get 
which views.

>  
>
>>I found it interesting although I haven't had time to give it a try 
>>especially since I'm thinking about leaving bind9 for djbdns and 
>>ldap2dns even though I've never been crazy about djbdns and family.
>>    
>>
>
>	djbdns is ok as long as you don't plan on using IPv6, EDNS0 or DNSSEC.
>
>	Phil
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>  
>