Call for performance evaluation: net.isr.direct (fwd)
Poul-Henning Kamp
phk at phk.freebsd.dk
Fri Oct 14 01:46:56 PDT 2005
In message <17230.62415.991707.840932 at grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>, Andrew Gallatin
writes:
>Linux already takes care of syncing the TSC between SMP cpus, so we
>know it is possible. This seems like a much more doable optimization.
>And it is likely to have other benefits..
Validating that the TSC is reliable is a nontrivial task which requires
access to a lot of NDA information and an extensive positive/negative
list of chips and chipsets.
Even in the most recent chips, there are still issues with TSC that
makes it unusable as a default timecounter.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk at FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list