Bug in routing tables ?

[Ricardo A. Reis]

Hi Milan,

          I use route with /netmask[bits] GW, this work fine for me for 
severals years, I erred in never read route(8)  :-(  but this 
"136.16&0xac160181" is very strange for me, and for you ?

>On Thursday 24 November 2005 17:28, Ricardo A. Reis wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>        I insert this route in my workstation for network test,
>>
>>#route add -net 200.144.xx.xx 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x
>>
>>    
>>
>
>man route:
>
>           route [-n] command [-net | -host] destination gateway [netmask]
>
>so no, this ain't network bug, just screwed usage.
>Regards,
>Milan
>
>  
>
>>Routing tables
>>
>>Internet:
>>Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
>>default            200.144.xx.xxx     UGS         1    13407    rl0
>>127.0.0.1          127.0.0.1          UH          0       46    lo0
>>136.16&0xac160181  255.255.254.0      UGS         0       34    rl0
>>??????????????????????????
>>
>>
>>The question is ........................ this is a network bug?
>>
>>
>>
>>OBS: using /23 this work perfectly!!
>>
>>
>>
>>Ricardo A. Reis
>>UNIFESP
>>Unix and Network Admin
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>    
>>
>
>  
>