TCP URG point

[Andre Oppermann]

Li, Qing wrote:
> 	It appears the TCP urgent pointer is off by 1.
> 
> 	In RFC-1122, section 4.2.2.4 on Page 83 describes the
> 	urgent pointer error in RFC-793.
> 
> 	The 6.0-CURRENT code has the urgent pointer set
> 	to (LAST+1).
> 
> 	Any comments before I sent a PR ?

No, please do and send me the PR number.

-- 
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"