in.c autoadding prefix route
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at freebsd.org
Sun Jul 3 00:08:52 GMT 2005
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 01:16:31AM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 22:55, Andrea Campi wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:24:05PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> > > The attached patch (http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/in.c.patch) derived
> > > from WIDE via OpenBSD in.c, rev 1.21 improves the handling of automatic
> > > prefix routes.
> >
> > Sounds like a very useful change indeed.
> >
> > One comment though:
> > > @@ -743,26 +766,7 @@
> > > return (0);
> > > flags |= RTF_HOST;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > - /*-
> > > - * Don't add host routes for interface addresses of
> > > - * 0.0.0.0 --> 0.255.255.255 netmask 255.0.0.0. This makes it
> > > - * possible to assign several such address pairs with consistent
> > > - * results (no host route) and is required by BOOTP.
> > > - *
> > > - * XXX: This is ugly ! There should be a way for the caller to
> > > - * say that they don't want a host route.
> > > - */
> > > - if (ia->ia_addr.sin_addr.s_addr != INADDR_ANY ||
> > > - ia->ia_netmask != IN_CLASSA_NET ||
> > > - ia->ia_dstaddr.sin_addr.s_addr != htonl(IN_CLASSA_HOST)) {
> > > - if ((error = rtinit(&ia->ia_ifa, (int)RTM_ADD, flags)) != 0) {
> > > - ia->ia_addr = oldaddr;
> > > - return (error);
> > > - }
> > > - ia->ia_flags |= IFA_ROUTE;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > + error = in_addprefix(ia, flags);
> > > /*
> > > * If the interface supports multicast, join the "all hosts"
> > > * multicast group on that interface.
> >
> > Are you sure you want to go on if you got an error? Regardless, you should
> > probably have an empty line after in_addrprefix.
>
> Not sure how to deal with the error case. All errors we should get are memory
> related (as we check carefully that the rtinit will success). This means that
> the following in_addmulti will sleep if we hit it (in_addmulti mallocs with
> M_WAITOK) ... so I guess you are right and it's the least intrusive if we do
> return.
>
The old code did:
if ((error = rtinit()) != 0)
return (error);
Why the new code should behave differently, I fail to see? in_addprefix()
is just a wrapper around rtinit(), after all.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/attachments/20050703/3b262e47/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list