Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 21 10:09:29 PDT 2004
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
>>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net> said:
brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
brooks> best approach.
I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list