kern/56461: FreeBSD client rpc.lockd incompatible with Linux
server rpc.lockd
Barney Wolff
barney at databus.com
Fri Jun 18 21:09:54 GMT 2004
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:51:21AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> *Sigh* make it a sysctl, but can someone please lay the smack
> down on the linuxiots and have them fix thier crap?
>
> * Bruce M Simpson <bms at spc.org> [040618 04:50] wrote:
> >
> > Linux NFS advisory locks are broken and incompatible with the rest
> > of the world. FreeBSD 5.x in particular uses BSD/OS derived NFS code
> > and thus is affected. FreeBSD 4.x does not implement client-side NFS
> > advisory locks.
> >
> > This problem is also documented as existing for MacOS X, IRIX and BSD/OS:
> > http://www.netsys.com/bsdi-users/2002-04/msg00036.html
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0311.0/0498.html
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-July/001833.html
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-April/000592.html
> >
> > The patch provided in the PR is verified to solve the problem, but
> > it would be good to make this functionality optional at run-time,
> > as many people are likely to be using Linux NFS shares read/write
> > with advisory locks.
Pardon an ignorant question, but what happens to unfortunate people who
have to talk to both Linux and non-quirky servers at the same time? Is
there a way to detect what flavor of server you're talking to and adjust
accordingly? That would be far better than a sysctl.
--
Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list