'ipv6' type in /etc/protocols ?
Juan Rodriguez Hervella
jrh at it.uc3m.es
Wed Jan 14 06:06:19 PST 2004
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 10:29, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> hi,
> in implementing ipv6 support for ipfw2, i hit the following
> problem: /etc/protocols has an entry:
>
> ipv6 41 IPV6 # ipv6
>
> which is somewhat confusing for the parser -- if you
> type something like
>
> ipfw add allow ipv6 from foo to bar
>
> the "ipv6" will match in the call to getprotobyname() and
> the above will be translated into a rule that matches packets with
> ip->ip_proto == 41 (6 is TCP, 17 is UDP, etc.), while i presume
> that what one would really want with the above notation is to
> match IPv6 packets, i.e.
>
> + layer2 packets with mac-type 0x86dd (ipv6)
> + layer3 packets with ip->ip_v == 6
>
> Now, i can put a special case for the keyword 'ipv6', but
> I wonder, what do we do with ip->ip_proto == 41 ? Does it
> make sense to handle this request ?
I think that it makes sense if you want to parse IPv6 in IPv4
packets.
> And in this case,
> what name do we use for it to avoid conflicts ?
Ipv6-encap ? ipv6-in-ipv4 ? ipv64 ? .....I dont know...
I agree with you that if somebody
specifies the word "Ipv6", what he/she wants to is to get
normal IPv6 packets, not IPv6 in IPv4 packets....imho.
> Looking at /sys/netinet/in.h, it appears that
> ip_proto == 4 and 41 refer to encapsulations of ipv4 and ipv6
> into ip...
You are right.
--
******
JFRH
******
In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way.
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list