PIM IPv4 user-level process

[Bruce M Simpson]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:20:19PM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote:
> A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the
> pim part.  That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily.  But it is
> a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build.

XORP would be good as a separate port, but for PIM alone, the USC code
might be a better starting point. I think XORP has a much wider scope;
considering it's an alternative to Quagga et al.

BMS