Performance improvement for NAT in IPFIREWALL
Mike Silbersack
silby at silby.com
Wed Jul 2 17:30:36 PDT 2003
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> By itself, NAT provides no benefit to security, and some implementations
> actually reduce the security of the system compared with not running NAT. Let
> me pull out a couple of quotes from various people:
Please explain this point more.
Say I have 1000 win 9x boxes connected to the internet with routable IPs
and no firewall. How will placing them behind a NAT box make them less
secure?
Mike "Silby" Silbersack
More information about the freebsd-net
mailing list