Portshaker: feature request

[Romain Tartière]

Hi Phillip
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:43:36PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote:
> Im portshaking in a cron, so i was thinking about a flag like "-- 
> force=install" one could pass to portshaker, so it does not wait for  
> user input to work ("unatended mode")
Well, you can skip these messages by appending an exclamation mark after
the source ports tree name in your xxx_merge_from variable (see
portshaker.conf(5)).

As an example, I used to have this in my conf:
tb_bsdsharp_trunk_gnome_ports_tree="/usr/local/tinderbox/portstrees/bsd-sharp-gnome/ports"
tb_bsdsharp_trunk_gnome_merge_from="freebsd mc_ports_stable! mc_ports! bsdsharp"

It is however possible to specify some sort of force option if this does
not fits your needs ;-)

Romain

-- 
Romain Tartière <romain at blogreen.org>        http://romain.blogreen.org/
pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024 F82A  E748 D8E9 A33F FF56 FF43 (ID: 0xFF56FF43)
(plain text =non-HTML= PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much appreciated)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mono/attachments/20090312/fbcb3e90/attachment.pgp