More if_ath churn coming your way!

[Adrian Chadd]

So it's all completely stable for you too right now?



adrian

2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru>:
> Hello!
>
> 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>:
>> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>  I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
>>>  if_ath code into -HEAD.
>>
>> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
>> all the code was just shuffled around a bit.
>>
>> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
>> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
>> would test this out and get back to me.
>
> FreeBSD 9.0-900030-CURRENT #0 r217695M: Sat Jan 22 13:57:57 VLAT 2011
> ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xf0000000-0xf000ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci9
> ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0
>
> Signal strength is fine, no packets loss.
> ath 9285 was stable for me last months.
> Acer Ferrari One 200 laptop with half-sized atheros wifi card.
>
>> I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing
>> over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic
>> 802.11n support for testing.
>
> --
> Dima Panov (fluffy at FreeBSD.org)
> KDE at FreeBSD team
>
> Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157
>