hack for getting suspend/resume to half work on an IBM Thinkpad
x60s [SMP]
Andrea Bittau
a.bittau at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Tue Oct 3 14:34:13 PDT 2006
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:03:31PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> I agree. The standard switch to protected mode, paging, etc. needs to
> be performed and then resume from the saved register context.
I guess my point was that there are two pieces of code that do that:
1) mpboot.s bootMP() used by system bootstrap and what my current patch uses. I
think this is what you guys are suggesting to use, and I'm doing it anyway in
my patch, but I just want to be the devil's advocate =D.
2) acpi_wakecode.S wakeup_16() used by the BSP to wake itself up. This is what
I was suggesting should be generalized and used by the other cores too. The
difference of this code as opposed to #1 is that #2 can "cheat". That is, we
can create the code for #2 on the fly and do stuff like mov old_eax,eax etc
and don't have to be smart about figuring out where the CPU should land and
how it should initialize itself [as in the case of #1].
I'm just wondering whether we should do something about the assembly "code
duplication" in #1 and #2. I understand they serve a different purpose, but
arguably, they do the same thing: real-mode -> jump in kernel. What is
different is what happens once in kernel mode: boot or resume? That difference
could be coded in the C part of the kernel leaving a single asm entry point both
for bootstrap and wakeup code. Am I making any sense? =D
More information about the freebsd-mobile
mailing list