is azureus finally okay?

[Panagiotis Astithas]

Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Aug 21), Ion-Mihai Tetcu said:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:50:41 +0200 anon <goatse at phreaker.net> wrote:
>>
>>>I have used many bittorrent programs, Currently im using bittornado
>>>after using rtorrent (great program but crashing all the time) But
>>>Bittornado doesnt relly have all the good functions like a torrent
>>>queue for example...
>>>
>>>Anyway I have had freeBSD 5.3 and my runnings with azureus have
>>>always been troublesome, because azureus+freeBSD arent the best
>>>friends... last time I tried with 2.2.0.0 and jdk-14 it didnt work,
>>>only time it worked was when I tried an CVS nightbuild, with an old
>>>azureus version, like 1.4 ... but that crashed once in a while
>>>too...
>>>
>>>So im just wondering 1) is azureus, latest version from ports
>>>finally hassle/bug/crash free? and therefore 1 b) is jdk 1.5
>>>finally working and okay?  not just beta, or that I have to use
>>>linux 1.5 java
>>
>>Right now azureus won't compile because of the new eclipse version.
> 
> 
> I'm not sure why azureus requires eclipse at all.  I have a homemade
> port at http://dan.allantgroup.com/FreeBSD/swt-dan.tar.gz that builds a
> standalone libswt, and I just use the jar file provided on the azureus
> web site.  There are no source patches in the current azureus port, so
> it doesn't really make any sense to have to recompile it.
> 

A standalone swt port was on my todo list, as well. Why don't you commit 
it, perhaps as swt30 and I'll work on swt31?

Regards,

Panagiotis