kqueue(2) kevents for jails
Fabian Freyer
fabian.freyer at physik.tu-berlin.de
Fri Jan 4 21:22:32 UTC 2019
On 1/4/19 9:29 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:11:58PM +0100, Fabian Freyer wrote:
>> On 1/4/19 5:14 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> No, kevent(2) is not suitable mechanism to notify about jail state changes.
>>> If anything in the existing system can be reused for such notifications,
>>> it is devctl(4) notifications which are handled by devd(8). Look at the
>>> man pages and for existing notifications in kernel code, e.g.
>>> sys/kern/kern_conf.c notify*() for how devfs does it.
>>
>> Can any running binary subscribe to devd(8) events or does that require
>> a configuration change in /etc/devd.conf?
>
> Only one reader is supported, effectively. devctl(4) tries to limit opens
> naively. But then even if you have the file descriptor and fork or pass
> it over unix domain socket, single event can be only read by one reader.
>
Ah, I see, thanks! Is there any other nice notification mechanism that a
process could 'subscribe' to to be notified of an event?
I am still a bit confused as to why knotify would be such a bad fit,
maybe you could expand a bit on that?
> Not least because jail creation/destruction is relatively low frequency
> events with potentially rich secondary information that should be attached
> to them. Kevents are high-frequency, high-performance kind of events,
Does this mean they cannot nicely be used for lower-frequency things?
I'm thinking of situations where jails may get spawned e.g.
per-network-request.
> and only naturally tied to file descriptors.
according to kevent(2),
EVFILT_PROC Takes the process ID to monitor as the identifier
so there's also cases where it isn't tied to a file descriptor, but some
other descriptor (pid's don't seem to be too different to jid's?)
> There were lot of bugs in
> integration of kevents with e.g. processes notifications, and API is
> still somewhat racy
Is this a kevents issue or an integration problem?
In the end, might it be a good idea to add devctl(4) notifications as
well as kevent(2)?
More information about the freebsd-jail
mailing list