Changing jail's IP automatically

[Miroslav Lachman]

Grzegorz Junka wrote on 09/04/2016 18:32:
> Probably it would, I didn't try. Is this is the proper way of solving
> this issue?

If I was you I will definitely use 1:1 biNAT. Because then you can write 
PF rules in way without knowing the future IP assigned by DHCP. (you 
will use interface name, not IP on this interface)

> On 03/09/2016 15:49, James Lodge wrote:
>> Would PF and NAT not work for you? NAT to the WLAN0 IP (DHCP assigned)
>> using PF macros and have a separate subnet for your jails? This would
>> be PAT so you might have issues with accessing services inbound if
>> you're using the same port in multiple jails. Just an idea.....