[Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas]

Guys, please don't take me bad, but better stop this "@%!" and use your
talent to help me found a way to properly measure bandwidth per jails in
a long period.

I am using sysutils/jail2 port to start/stop jails, My working
configuration so far is this:

I use the jid so that later I can use in /etc/rctl.conf with something like:

jail:30:maxproc:deny=100
jail:30:memoryuse:deny=512M
jail:30:swapuse:deny=1G

my jail.conf looks like

8<----------
* {
  exec.start = "/bin/sh /etc/rc";
  exec.stop = "/bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown";
  exec.clean;
  mount.devfs;
  allow.raw_sockets;
  securelevel = 3;
}

www {
  jid = 10;
  name = www;
  host.hostname = $name.localbox.org;
  ip4.addr = 174.143.193.60;
  path = /jails/www;
  mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name";
}

vpn {
  jid = 20;
  name = vpn;
  host.hostname = $name.localbox.org;
  ip4.addr = 174.143.193.57, 10.216.28.77;
  path = /jails/vpn;
  mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name";
}

guest {
  jid = 30;
  name = guest;
  host.hostname = $name.localbox.org;
  ip4.addr = 174.143.193.61;
  path = /jails/guest;
  mount.fstab="/etc/fstab.$name";
}
8<----------



On 03/22/2013 22:32, sib at tormail.org wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Fbsd8 <fbsd8 at a1poweruser.com> wrote:
>> Boy this simple critique request sure has gotten out of hand. So lets
> set the record straight.
>
> You got exactly what you asked for.
>
>> On the subject ezjail not being referenced in the document like it is in
> the current version of the online handbook is just a writing content
> error.
>
> With all the spam you've put on the forums and mailing list(s) about
> qjail, I wonder how true it is that you just "whoops, forgot to mention
> ezjail" in your propaganda rewrite.
>
>> When it comes to the question of the handbook jail chapter needing
>> updating, A member of the document team has already offered to partner up
>> with me to get it added to the handbook as fast as possible.
> The documentation team will never accept such poorly-written stuff that's
> laced with "use qjail use qjail use qjail - it's the only way!" I'll
> believe it when I see it.
>
>> On the subject of qjail being a fork of ezjail, of course it is.
> Forks don't completely overwrite the copyright of a project and claim it
> as their own, while just changing variable names and renaming the tool
> something else. This is not a fork, it's a complete rip-off that gives no
> credit to the original author (who did MUCH more of the work).
>
>> Qjail was developed by the qjail project team
> No it wasn't. It was developed by the ezjail author, and you just made
> small changes and called it your own.
>
>> Our British member concluded that the author of ezjail must be British
> based solely on the spelling of the flavour directory. He also convinced
> us that his Beerware license was British humor, a joke, and should not be
> taken serous.
>
> I think the GPL is a joke, but people still take it seriously. You can't
> just decide a license should be completely ignored.
>
>> I was chosen the project leader and public voice only because my English
> was the best among us.
>
> It gives me a headache trying to read some of the stuff you write. You've
> got an American guy and a British guy and neither of their native English
> is better than yours?
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-jail at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-jail-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"