starting jails in the background & dependencies
Alexander Leidinger
Alexander at Leidinger.net
Mon Jan 25 08:26:10 UTC 2010
Quoting Remko Lodder <remko at FreeBSD.org> (from Mon, 25 Jan 2010
07:44:10 +0100):
>
>
>> Note that I haven't tsted it, but I don't see any errors in the patch.
>>
>>> ---snip---
>
>> --
>> Simon L. Nielsen
>>
>
> Snipping a whole lot of data...
>
> Thanks Simon, I will try to get to that as soon as possible, Alexander:
> please feel free to do it earlier if possible, my internet access is
> "limited" (or at least commit capabilities).
I have this running as I posted it. I can confirm that the
jail_parallel_start=no works as expected. I didn't try the YES case. I
am not happy about my man page change. Anyone with a better
description? We do not start the jails in parallel, we start the jails
serially in the background. I think the variable name is ok, as we
start the jails in parallel to the rest of the system start scripts. I
do not want to limit the wording so that it prevents to really start
the jails in parallel instead of serially in the background, while
still telling that it is done in parallel to the rest of the scripts.
If I get some time today, I will think about a better wording (if I do
not get something from the people reading this before).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
There's nothing remarkable about it. All one has to do is hit the right
keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself.
-- J. S. Bach
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
More information about the freebsd-jail
mailing list