Multicast in jail?
Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net
Tue Jul 7 11:10:08 UTC 2009
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Bill Marquette <bill.marquette at ucsecurity.com> (from Mon, 6 Jul 2009
> 20:14:02 -0500 (CDT)):
>
>> I'm trying to run Avahi in a jail, much the same as Alexander Leidinger in
>> this email from late last year
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-jail@freebsd.org/msg00587.html. I
>> couldn't find any replies to that thread and it seems that I'm running into
>> the same issues - the service announcements make it on the wire and the
>> other devices in the network see them.
>
> So far I have nothing working.
>
> I assume that the mcast traffic is not arriving at all IPs. <wild
> guess>Either because on overly restrictive jail check, and/or just because
> there's no code which is distributing the traffic to all IPs.</wild guess>
>
> It seems kern_jail.c is a place to check if there's some code which handles
No, in_pcb.c in6_pcb.c in_m*.[ch] in6_m*.[ch] are the files you need
as a starting point; there's more and more and more.
> this. Maybe prison_check_ip[46] if mcast is on top of this, or something new
> to write if mcast is a different "AF". Again, this is a wild guess, I don't
> have enough understanding of the network code in the kernel to even make
> educated guesses about the real reason.
But you first will have to understand all implications, that need a
proper design plan and after that thoughtout implementation.
Alternatively I wouldn't wonder if enabling raw sockets would give
what you want or you'll wait for virtualization to be ready.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
More information about the freebsd-jail
mailing list