spamd inside jail.

[Redd Vinylene]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Peter Ankerstål <peter at pean.org> wrote:

>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Redd Vinylene wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Peter Ankerstål <peter at pean.org> wrote:
>
>> I cant start spamd inside my new jails running 7.2-PRERELEASE.
>>
>> [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 1: spamd: could not create
>> INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address
>> [3679] warn: server socket setup failed, retry 2: spamd: could not create
>> INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested address
>> [3679] error: spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign
>> requested address
>> spamd: could not create INET socket on ip:783: Can't assign requested
>> address
>>
>> running on
>> FreeBSD new.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #2: Tue Mar
>> 24 00:06:58 UTC 2009     peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMURAI  amd64
>>
>> But on
>> FreeBSD old.machine.tld 7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sat Mar
>> 28 15:30:25 CET 2009     peter@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINJA  amd64
>>
>> everything still works fine.
>>
>> other programs can bind to adresses and so on but not spamd.
>>
>> I tried to write something like this:
>> http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=416119
>> but with tcp and port 783, not warnings or error messages. Do you think
>> this is
>> a jail-issue or a spamd issue?
>>
>> I have tried to config spamd to bind to alot of different addresses with
>> same result
>> 0.0.0.0, 127.0.0.1, the jails ip and so on.
>>
>> --
>> Peter Ankerstål
>> peter at pean.org
>> http://www.pean.org/
>>
>>
> For what it's worth, other than taking up a lot of resources, spamd will
> hardly stop any spam.
>
> --
> http://www.home.no/reddvinylene
>
> I dont know if I was clear about that Im using p5-Mail-Spamassasin.
> But if you have any pointers what I should use instead I would be very
> happy.
> Maybe even a guide? :)
>
> It needs to be something simple. Not a large mysql-database and
> admin-interface.
> Jast a daemon that postfix could use to check for spam.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Peter Ankerstål
> peter at pean.org
> http://www.pean.org/
>
>
Indeed, check out the postgrey port. I think it's exactly what you want.

-- 
http://www.home.no/reddvinylene