Call for testers: ng_netflow with v9 and IPv6 support
Julian Elischer
julian at elischer.org
Mon Sep 7 01:37:00 UTC 2009
grarpamp wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to support the obvious formal emergent standards
> track protocol instead of the legacy informational one? Or to perform
> both via sysctl or other arguments/defines, with the standard IPFIX
> being the default mode? Have you reviewed the nProbe code for other
> various ideas? Thanks for working on netflow :) And any form of v6
> is good to have finally.
if you have time it sounds like you know enough about it to be
useful.. get involved :-)
>
> =========================================================================
>
> Network Working Group B. Claise, Ed.
> Request for Comments: 5101 Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Category: Standards Track January 2008
> Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol
> for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information
> This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
> Internet community
>
>
> Network Working Group J. Quittek
> Request for Comments: 5102 NEC
> Category: Standards Track S. Bryant
> B. Claise
> P. Aitken
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> J. Meyer
> PayPal
> January 2008
> Information Model for IP Flow Information Export
> This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
> Internet community
>
>
> Network Working Group B. Trammell
> Request for Comments: 5103 CERT/NetSA
> Category: Standards Track E. Boschi
> Hitachi Europe
> January 2008
> Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
> This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
> Internet community
>
>
> Network Working Group E. Boschi
> Request for Comments: 5153 Hitachi Europe
> Category: Informational L. Mark
> Fraunhofer FOKUS
> J. Quittek
> M. Stiemerling
> NEC
> P. Aitken
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> April 2008
> IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Implementation Guidelines
> This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
> not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
>
>
> Network Working Group S. Leinen
> Request for Comments: 3955 SWITCH
> Category: Informational October 2004
> Evaluation of Candidate Protocols for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
> This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
> not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
>
>
> Network Working Group J. Quittek
> Request for Comments: 3917 NEC Europe Ltd.
> Category: Informational T. Zseby
> Fraunhofer FOKUS
> B. Claise
> Cisco Systems
> S. Zander
> Swinburne University
> October 2004
> Requirements for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
> This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
> not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
>
>
> And others...
>
> =========================================================================
>
> Network Working Group B. Claise, Ed.
> Request for Comments: 3954 Cisco Systems
> Category: Informational October 2004
> Cisco Systems NetFlow Services Export Version 9
> This RFC documents the NetFlow services export protocol Version 9 as
> it was when submitted to the IETF as a basis for further work in the
> IPFIX WG.
> This RFC itself is not a candidate for any level of Internet
> Standard. The IETF disclaims any knowledge of the fitness of this
> RFC for any purpose...
>
> And others...
>
> =========================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-isp
mailing list