ipfw rule processing performances
Luigi Rizzo
rizzo at iet.unipi.it
Tue Oct 25 16:51:55 UTC 2011
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36:47AM -0400, Karim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using ipfw with a fairly small amount of rules (~200). Most of
> those are skipto rules to different blocking and pass-through blocks. I
> use ipfw tags, ALTQ, nat, fwd and several deny and allow rules and I do
> not use/need tables.
>
> What I find is around 400Mbps of traffic (~40kpps) an extremely high
> amount of cpu usage related to firewall processing.
>
> What I would like to know is if there is an ongoing work to optimise
> ipfw and/or gather ideas on how to do that.
>
> I realise my question has a large scope but I am not interested in
> optimizing my ruleset I'd like to get a feel for how code wise the
> current processing could be optimized (using multiple input TX/RX queues
> for example, etc...).
we did some performance evaluation a couple of years ago,
mostly related to dummynet but there are some ipfw data too.
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/papers/20100304-ccr.pdf
in summary, on a modern CPU i would expect to get to 200kpps
with moderate cpu usage, unless you have an expensive or
poorly designed ruleset. Unfortunately tags are very expensive,
but i have no idea of the nat overhead.
cheers
luigi
> Karim.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-ipfw
mailing list