ISO downloads with multiple mirrors for higher reliabilty,
automatic checksum verification
Francois Petillon
fantec at proxad.net
Tue Nov 7 14:50:33 UTC 2006
Anthony L. Bryan wrote:
> I can not force download managers or metalink clients to change how
> they have been behaving for years, but I can encourage them to be
> respectful of server resources.
You are encouraging people to misbehave :
---- http://www.metalinker.org/why.html
Metalink was designed for describing the locations of large files that
are multi-located (shared via many mirrors and with P2P) so segments can
be downloaded from different places at the same time, automatically.
----
Automatic load balancing distributes traffic so individual servers are
under less strain.
----
> Can you think of some per transfer and per server options that would help
> the situation?
As far as I am concerned, either someone uses a single connection to a
local/nearby server to download (using segmented download should be use
only for failover), or he uses P2P.
I will quote Marco d'Itri (cf debian-devel ML last september) :
----
To summarize the issue:
* parallel downloads are bad
* using P2P when local mirrors are available is very bad
----
François
More information about the freebsd-hubs
mailing list