Multiprocessor system VS one processor system
Erich Dollansky
oceanare at pacific.net.sg
Thu Mar 18 21:30:06 PST 2004
Hi,
Lanny Baron wrote:
> Hi Erich,
> Yes you are right. A Server Board cannot be changed with the expectation
> that the system to still run.
>
> But as I said, with real redundancy, as some of our customers do have,
> such that if Server 1 died, Server 2 picks up immediately. The cost of
> which, is substantially less than that of systems such as you imply.
>
The price is real high but it is still the only way to make sure
that the interruption is minimal and the data loss is also minimal.
It depends very much on the application. Banks are a typical
application for systems like this. Who would like that the
credited amount got lost just because the server failed in that
moment of time?
They have the money, they can afford it.
Erich
More information about the freebsd-hardware
mailing list