Why is tc_get_timecount() called two times in tc_init()?
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Fri Oct 4 14:05:29 UTC 2019
On 03/10/2019 17:24, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <CANCZdfpcOBJiYAKafhiWZS2g4vnLGVvzqhaOXetSSnU2Hj91nw at mail.gmail.com>
> , Warner Losh writes:
>
>> I think this is a good fix. I recall phk saying it was more paranoia for
>> edge cases than really needed in a private email to me, but it's in the
>> 'gap' of email that I lost in a disk crash 12 years ago so I can't find it
>> for sure.
>
> I think the original reason for this was (locked) delta-based
> timecounters, (ie counters which roll over rapidly) in order that
> their first "real" use would not return truly bogus values.
Ok, this explanation makes sense. When I ported the FreeBSD timecounter
implementation to RTEMS I was a bit surprised how many chips (even a
Cortex-M has nothing out of the box) lack a simple free running counter.
Maybe it should be added as a comment to these two tc_get_timecount() calls?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list