FCP 20190401-ci_policy: CI policy

[Matthew Seaman]

On 30/08/2019 00:35, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019, 5:27 PM Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 17:32, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>> In the past, if someone had any follow on work at all in their tree, the
>>> reversion would be quite disruptive to that work.
>> This sounds more like a problem with the tooling than an argument
>> against reverting though.
>>
> We live in a subversion universe for the moment, so you have to view it
> through that lens.

Hmmm... given our declared intention to switch to git, how relevant will
this FCP be given the sort of workflows typical with git?  As in a
typical scenario would be that you work on a topic branch, and one
pre-condition for merging your branch into the mainstream is that it
passes the CI testing?  Also, implicitly in that scenario, that a
standard part of doing any piece of work is to develop tests covering
any relevant changes introduced.

	Cheers,

	Matthew



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20190830/e7857ec5/attachment.sig>