PRs are being closed for bogus reasons :-(

[Andrey V. Elsukov]

On 01.06.2018 00:07, Warner Losh wrote:
> So, is this idea? Nope. However, it's clear that the project doesn't have
> the resources to re-validate bugs as still being a bug, at least given the
> volume of bugs in our bug database. This is not a terrible "second best"
> idea that should help the signal / noise ratio of the PR database, which
> makes it more valuable to developers and others that might fancy fixing a
> bug.

The one thing that I like in GNATS and lack now, it sends weekly reports
with list of assigned bugs. This was handy. Each committer and also a
project mailing list got such list every week. And this was a good
reminder to take a look to open bugs, to fixed and not yet closed bugs, etc.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20180601/a236e06f/attachment.sig>