[PATCH] Simplify th_bintime update in tc_windup()
Sebastian Huber
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Wed Oct 11 09:49:10 UTC 2017
On 11/10/17 11:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> The th_bintime, th_microtime and th_nanotime members of the timehand all
>> cache the last system time (uptime + boottime). Only the format
>> differs. Do not re-calculate the bintime and simply use the value used
>> to calculate the microtime and nanotime.
>>
>> Group all the updates under the relevant comment.
> th->th_bintime is recalculated after possible adjustments made by
> the ntp loop to the th_boottime.
The loop is:
bt = th->th_offset;
bintime_add(&bt, &th->th_boottime);
<--- here the bt is our new system time
i = bt.sec - tho->th_microtime.tv_sec;
if (i > LARGE_STEP)
i = 2;
for (; i > 0; i--) {
t = bt.sec;
ntp_update_second(&th->th_adjustment, &bt.sec);
if (bt.sec != t)
<-- here the bt.sec changed
th->th_boottime.sec += bt.sec - t;
<-- here we update the boottime seconds, so now bt == uptime + boottime
}
So, I think the patch is correct.
>
> But your patch makes me consider the two lines after the XXX comment.
> Shouldn't we use the updated th_bintime instead of the pre-adjustment
> bt value ?
>
All values should reflect the same time.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list