The minimum amount of memory needed to use ZFS.
Stephen Hocking
stephen.hocking at gmail.com
Wed Dec 23 11:41:15 UTC 2015
In my case, I want to use ZFS. I'm currently running FreeBSD on a number of
systems, ranging from 16G (box with multiple ZFS pools and filesystems) to
256M (Early RPI), so I know it runs OK in relatively small amounts of
memory (aeons ago I was running it one a box with 8MB). I was curious to
know what people think it needs to run ZFS without problems.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:43:37PM +1100, Stephen Hocking wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Inspired by this article:
> >
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/12/rsync-net-zfs-replication-to-the-cloud-is-finally-here-and-its-fast/
> >
> > I am wondering about changing my offsite back strategy, which currently
> is
> > made up of a Raspberry Pi with an external 3TB drive sitting at my
> > brother's house, with periodic manual rsyncs. I'd like to change that to
> > doing zfs replications.
> >
> > I want to use some of my ARM based hardware as the target for the ZFS
> > replication, owing to its low power usage. I have a few Cubiboxes
> floating
> > around with around 2G of RAM, and a RPI2 or a Banana Pi with 1G. It'd
> have
> > a UFS root on the SD card, and ZFS on the external drive.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> I am do install FreeBSD i386 10 on the VirtualBox VM with 384M RAM and
> successful pass `make buildworld`.
>
> In the real world all depends on workload and minimal depends from FS
> (UFS or ZFS).
>
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list