mmap MAP_NOSYNC regression in 10.x

Konstantin Belousov kostikbel at gmail.com
Sat Sep 6 15:41:17 UTC 2014


On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 05:10:44PM +0200, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov schreef op 6-9-2014 9:48:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 12:46:31PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> Is this worth putting into the regression test suite?
> > I do not have opinion on this.  Feel free to do if you consider it worth.
> >
> > Note that the code needs some tweaking to become automated test.
> > Also, there is no copyright assigned on the test, so you need
> > to handle this as well.
> >
> 
> I can take a stab at converting it to something suitable for inclusion 
> under tools/regression. One issue is that the test uses a heuristic to 
> determine success or failure. I don't really see a way around that, 
> although it certainly could be improved.
This is sort of what I mean about tweaking, besides using the standard
test report format.

If you provide complete patch for test case, somebody (or
me if nobody else volunteer) will definitely commit it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20140906/355fb807/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list