ipfw pipe config bw tun0
Adrian Chadd
adrian at freebsd.org
Sun Jun 29 16:29:45 UTC 2014
We can start adding that. How should it behave for multi-queue devices?
-a
On 29 June 2014 07:52, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo at iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
> wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>> i tried to use ipfw dummynet as described in manual
>>
>> ---
>> If a device name is specified instead of a numeric value, as in
>>
>> ipfw pipe 1 config bw tun0
>>
>> then the transmit clock is supplied by the specified device.
>> At
>> the moment only the tun(4) device supports this functionality,
>> for use in conjunction with ppp(8).
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>> got "no if support" error message. what i missed?
>>
>
> you missed nothing -- it's just that no device that i know
> of still implements the feature.
> i implemented it 15 years ago and enabled it on the 'ed'
> device driver only.
>
> What it needed is a notification on the transmit
> interrupt to kick the pipe and tell it how many
> packets went out (at the time 'ed' only supported
> one packet at a time, so the code might make
> assumptions).
>
> It might need a bit of redesign these days to make it
> work efficiently with fast pipes and deep interface queues.
>
> cheers
> luigi
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list