stopped processes using cpu?

Tim Kientzle tim at kientzle.com
Wed Aug 20 02:15:14 UTC 2014


On Aug 19, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Allan Jude <allanjude at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 2014-08-19 15:21, Dieter BSD wrote:
>> 8.2 on amd64
>> Top(1) with no arguments reports that some firefox processes are using cpu
>> dispite being stopped (via kill -stop pid) for at least several hours.
>> Adding -C doesn't change the numbers.  Ps(1) reports the same.
>> Interestingly, a firefox that isn't stopped is (correctly?) reported as
>> using 0 cpu.  The 100% idle should be correct, but who knows.
>> 
>> last pid: 51932;  load averages:  0.07, 0.99, 1.42 up 14+19:02:56  08:48:28
>> 267 processes: 1 running, 138 sleeping, 128 stopped
>> CPU:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice,  0.0% system,  0.0% interrupt,  100% idle
>> Mem: 1665M Active, 653M Inact, 240M Wired, 95M Cache, 372M Buf, 815M Free
>> Swap: 8965M Total, 560K Used, 8965M Free
>> 
>>  PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU COMMAND
>> 44188 a           9  44    0   303M   187M STOP   113:19 13.43% firefox-bin
>> 92986 b          11  44    0   164M 62848K STOP     0:18  5.03% firefox-bin
>> 16507 c          11  44    0   189M 88976K STOP     0:13  0.24% firefox-bin
>> 2265 root        1  44    0   248M   193M select 625:38  0.00% Xorg
>> 51271 d          10  44    0   233M   128M ucond   12:12  0.00% firefox-bin
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> 
> 
> I wonder if jhb@'s new top code solves this. He adjusted the way CPU
> usage is tracked to be more responsive, and not based on averages

I wonder if jhb@’s new top code fixes the whacky WCPU values we’ve been seeing on FreeBSD/ARM.  (1713% CPU is a little hard to believe on a single-core board ;-).

Tim



More information about the freebsd-hackers mailing list