stopped processes using cpu?
Tim Kientzle
tim at kientzle.com
Wed Aug 20 02:15:14 UTC 2014
On Aug 19, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Allan Jude <allanjude at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 2014-08-19 15:21, Dieter BSD wrote:
>> 8.2 on amd64
>> Top(1) with no arguments reports that some firefox processes are using cpu
>> dispite being stopped (via kill -stop pid) for at least several hours.
>> Adding -C doesn't change the numbers. Ps(1) reports the same.
>> Interestingly, a firefox that isn't stopped is (correctly?) reported as
>> using 0 cpu. The 100% idle should be correct, but who knows.
>>
>> last pid: 51932; load averages: 0.07, 0.99, 1.42 up 14+19:02:56 08:48:28
>> 267 processes: 1 running, 138 sleeping, 128 stopped
>> CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle
>> Mem: 1665M Active, 653M Inact, 240M Wired, 95M Cache, 372M Buf, 815M Free
>> Swap: 8965M Total, 560K Used, 8965M Free
>>
>> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND
>> 44188 a 9 44 0 303M 187M STOP 113:19 13.43% firefox-bin
>> 92986 b 11 44 0 164M 62848K STOP 0:18 5.03% firefox-bin
>> 16507 c 11 44 0 189M 88976K STOP 0:13 0.24% firefox-bin
>> 2265 root 1 44 0 248M 193M select 625:38 0.00% Xorg
>> 51271 d 10 44 0 233M 128M ucond 12:12 0.00% firefox-bin
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>
> I wonder if jhb@'s new top code solves this. He adjusted the way CPU
> usage is tracked to be more responsive, and not based on averages
I wonder if jhb@’s new top code fixes the whacky WCPU values we’ve been seeing on FreeBSD/ARM. (1713% CPU is a little hard to believe on a single-core board ;-).
Tim
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list