>3955MiB of swap space

[Wojciech Puchar]

> prefer to repartition the drives for them to have swap partitions each of 
> size (3955/4)MiB.
>
> By the way, is swapping distributed evenly among the drives? How? Is there a 
yes.


> downfall when one of the drives is outstandingly slow?
no really. sometimes swapin would be slower, 3/4 times of cases faster, by 
average would be a bit slower.