9.1 callout behavior
Alexander Motin
mav at FreeBSD.org
Wed Dec 4 15:02:39 UTC 2013
On 04.12.2013 14:49, Bret Ketchum wrote:
> See attached. I've tightened up the definition of inconsistent
> callout calls. A "Whoops" message indicates the callout function was
> called either side of a 10ms window than what was expected. "Ouch"
> indicates the cyclecounter does not agree with the expected period given
> the same 10ms fudge factor.
I have this module running on two of my tests systems with stable/9
(2xE5645 and i7-3770) and half hour later I see no any of related
messages on consoles. Could you share what exactly do you have there logged?
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Bret Ketchum <bcketchum at gmail.com
> <mailto:bcketchum at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Alexander,
>
> In this scenario, global ticks should have increased by 100
> every interval. When the wheels go off the truck, global ticks will
> be 800+ yet only a fraction of usual number of clock cycles have
> increased.
>
> I'll try to cook up an kernel module which will reproduce.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Alexander Motin <mav at freebsd.org
> <mailto:mav at freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi, Brett,
>
> Could you tell more about "ticks has increased 8x"? Tickless
> mode it is somewhat tricky algorithm to track global ticks
> counter, but it should not jump that big. Jumps there could
> easily trigger wrong callout behavior in 9 (in 10 callout code
> was rewritten and no longer depend on ticks).
>
>
> On 21.11.2013 22:19, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> It sounds like you may have found an interesting test case.
>
> Mav, any ideas?
>
> On 21 November 2013 05:20, Bret Ketchum <bcketchum at gmail.com
> <mailto:bcketchum at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I've a callout which runs every 100ms and does a
> bit of accounting
> using the global ticks variable. This one-shot callout
> was called fairly
> consistently in 8.1, every 100ms give or take a few
> thousand clocks. I've
> recently upgraded to 9.1 and for the most part the
> period is consistent.
> However, periodically the callout function is executed
> anywhere between 5ms
> to 20ms after the callout was reset and the function
> returned while global
> ticks has increased 8x. The hardware has not changed
> (using the same
> timecounter configuration):
>
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 0 @ 2.50GHz
> (2500.05-MHz K8-class CPU)
>
> kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC-low
> kern.timecounter.tick: 1
> kern.timecounter.invariant___tsc: 1
> kern.timecounter.smp_tsc: 1
>
> And default eventtimer configuration:
>
> kern.eventtimer.singlemul: 2
> kern.eventtimer.idletick: 0
> kern.eventtimer.activetick: 1
> kern.eventtimer.timer: LAPIC
> kern.eventtimer.periodic: 0
>
> If tickless mode is disabled the inconsistency
> goes away. Is the
> premature expiration of the callout expected? Is the
> jump in global ticks
> typical (say from 100 ticks to 800 ticks in 1.5ms)?
>
> Bret
> _________________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org
> <mailto:freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org> mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/__mailman/listinfo/freebsd-__hackers
> <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at __freebsd.org
> <mailto:freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org>"
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Motin
>
>
>
--
Alexander Motin
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list