Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?..

[Karl Pielorz]

--On 30 October 2012 11:21 +0000 Steven Hartland <killing at multiplay.co.uk> 
wrote:

>> They've not been running longing enough yet to see if anything is
>> 'leaking'  (i.e. if size/res continues to go up). Just thought I'd ask
>> if there's a  simple/possible explanation for this - and if it's
>> something I need to  worry about...
>
> amd64 vs i386?

Nice try :) - But as I said in my original email (he says, checking again - 
yup it's in there ;) both the 6.4 and 9.0 systems are amd64... I'd expect 
the memory usage to 'go up' between the versions for the programs, I'm just 
concerned by the size increase...

-Karl