stop_cpus_hard when multiple CPUs are panicking from an NMI

[Attilio Rao]

On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg at freebsd.org> wrote:
> on 25/11/2012 20:05 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> If you really want to do something like that please rename
>> s/generic_stop_cpus/generic_stop_butself() or similar convention and I
>> may be not opposed to it.
>
> As we discussed before, anything else besides "all but self" does not make
> sense.  So I am not sure what's the point of being that verbose in the naming.

Avoid POLA violation and show there is a change in the KPI?

I'd personally prefer a new name, but I'm open on not getting it.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein