UFS1 vs UFS2

[Wojciech Puchar]

>
> I don't think performance will be much different but if so, UFS1 would
> be (sightly) faster than UFS2 because one page read will get more inodes
> from disk and 32 bit (UFS1) arithmetic may be slightly faster than 64 bit
> (UFS2).

thanks for answer i was looking for! i will rebuild FS to UFS1, saving ca 
1GB for inodes.

> If performance is an issue, consider turning off atime updates or even
> mount the filesystem read-only if possible.
i always turn off atime and use softupdates.

it cannot be readonly.