UFS1 vs UFS2
Wojciech Puchar
wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Sun Dec 30 19:41:31 UTC 2012
i chose with newfs as i don't use installer :)
anyway - it is not an answer to the question.
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Quentin SCHWERKOLT wrote:
> Since FreeBSD 9.0, you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition.
>
> Q. Schwerkolt
>
>> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100
>> From: wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
>> To: freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org
>> Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2
>>
>> OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB.
>>
>> FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes.
>> basic operation seems the same.
>>
>> Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem (on SSD) that would
>> have few millions of files. It will take less space for inodes, but how
>> about performance?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-hackers
mailing list