Replacing BIND with unbound

[Doug Barton]

On 08/20/2012 01:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:

> We will continue to reject this until there are more firm plans,
> proper documentation on the security support side, which I cannot
> remember Simon got an answer for.

I gave a clear answer. If there are any pieces missing it's up to Simon
to follow up with Dag-Erling.

> I continue to say that I am not willing to trade one for another
> for the sake of just changing the name.

Have you seriously not been paying attention to the numerous reasons why
BIND in the base is no longer a good fit?

In any case, importing ldns/unbound is a different question from
removing BIND. Not only do I not see any reason not to move forward on
the former, I think that once people see a solid implementation in place
already it will ease the fears about removing BIND.

Doug

-- 

    I am only one, but I am one.  I cannot do everything, but I can do
    something.  And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
    I can do.
			-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)