CONF class of files

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:50, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 June 2011 09:15, Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 18:40, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> Macros are being tested for bsd.port.mk that use a new class of files,
>>> in the same vein as the BINOWN variables I have introduced CONFOWN,
>>> CONFGRP, CONFMODE and CONFDIR.
>>> 
>>> Please would someone review and give an opinion on [1]?
>> 
>> Shouldn't $CONFDIR be set to ${PREFIX}/etc/ instead of /etc?
>> 
>> Also, if we define $CONFDIR, we should use it everywhere in bsd.*.mk where we currently use some form of */etc/* - otherwise we will get a mismatch if $CONFDIR is changed from the default.
> 
> CONFDIR is for base, not ports, just like most other stuff in that
> file. Have a look at the other DIR variables.

Gah, I was confused by you initial mail mentioning bsd.port.mk.

Rereading the patch, I think it looks good. I'd love to see this go in before 9.0 as well.

Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix at FreeBSD.org>





-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20110619/c9bc5cf2/PGP.pgp